rss
Evid Based Nurs 12:19 doi:10.1136/ebn.12.1.19
  • Treatment

Clinically indicated and routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters did not differ for catheter failure

J Webster

Ms J Webster, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia; joan_webster@health.qld.gov.au

QUESTION

In hospital inpatients, is clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous (IV) catheters better than routine replacement for catheter failure due to phlebitis or infiltration?

METHODS

Design:

randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Allocation:

concealed.

Blinding:

{unblinded}.*

Follow-up period:

up to 5 consecutive catheters for each patient.

Setting:

general tertiary hospital in Queensland, Australia.

Patients:

755 medical and surgical inpatients ⩾18 years of age (mean age 59 y, 64% men) who were expected to have a peripheral venous catheter for ⩾4 days. Exclusion criteria were bacteraemia or current immunosuppressive therapy.

Intervention:

379 patients were allocated to catheter replacement only when clinically indicated and 376 to routine catheter replacement every 3 …

No Related Web Pages

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>

EBN Journal Chat

The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

How to participate >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article