rss
Evid Based Nurs 11:113 doi:10.1136/ebn.11.4.113
  • Treatment

An automated external defibrillator in the home did not reduce all-cause mortality in patients at risk of cardiac arrest

G H Bardy

Dr G H Bardy, Seattle Institute for Cardiac Research, Seattle, WA, USA; gbardy@sicr.org

QUESTION

In stable patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac arrest, does having an automated external defibrillator (AED) in the home reduce all-cause mortality compared with training in usual emergency procedures?

METHODS

Design:

randomised controlled trial (Home Automated External Defibrillator Trial [HAT]).

Allocation:

{concealed}.*

Blinding:

blinded (outcome adjudication committee).

Follow-up period:

median 37 months.

Setting:

178 clinical sites in the USA, Canada, Australia, the UK, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and Germany.

Patients:

7001 patients (median age 62 y, 83% men) who had had anterior-wall myocardial infarction, were not candidates for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, and had a spouse or companion at home who was willing and able to perform the study interventions.

Intervention:

provision of an AED for home use (n = 3495) …

No Related Web Pages

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>

EBN Journal Chat

The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

How to participate >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article