Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
M H Murphy
Correspondence to: Dr M H Murphy, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Northern Ireland, UK; mh.murphy{at}ulster.ac.uk
QUESTION
In healthy sedentary adults, does regular brisk walking improve cardiovascular risk factors?
METHODS
Data sources:
Medline and Web of Science (1971 to September 2004) and reference lists.
Study selection and assessment:
English-language, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with duration ⩾4 weeks that assessed the effects of walking as the only intervention on changes in cardiovascular risk factors in sedentary, but otherwise healthy, adults. 24 RCTs (n = 1128, mean age 52 y, 83% women) met the selection criteria. The mean length of the walking programmes was 35 weeks (range 8–104 wk). On average, walking was done 4.4 days/week for 38 minutes per session. The mean intensity of the walking interventions was 70% of predicted maximum heart rate or 56% of VO2 max. Quality of individual studies was assessed based on allocation concealment.
Outcomes:
cardiovascular fitness (VO2 max), body weight, percent body fat, body mass index, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP).
MAIN RESULTS
Brisk walking increased cardiovascular fitness and reduced body weight, body mass index, body fat composition, and diastolic BP more than the control condition (table). No effect on systolic BP was observed (table).
CONCLUSION
In healthy sedentary adults, regular brisk walking improves cardiovascular fitness, body composition, and diastolic blood pressure.
A modified version of this abstract also appears in Evidence-Based Medicine.
ABSTRACTED FROM
Murphy MH, Nevill AM, Murtagh EM, et al. The effect of walking on fitness, fatness and resting blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials. Prev Med 2007;44:377–85.
Clinical impact ratings: Family/General practice 5/7; Health promotion 6/7; Obesity 4/7
Commentary
Walking has been described as a perfect exercise: it is familiar and convenient and can be sustained into old age.1 A recent commentary suggested that low intensity exercise such as walking improves health and probably improves metabolic control and other health parameters.2 The meta-analysis by Murphy et al provides much needed evidence concerning the effect of walking on cardiovascular risk factors.
The methodology for this meta-analysis was well detailed, but restricting the literature search to only 2 databases was a limitation, as was the mixed quality of the primary studies. Some of the methodological problems included small sample sizes, high dropout rates, and a lack of intention-to-treat analyses. Notwithstanding these issues, the results suggest that walking is associated with increased cardiovascular fitness and small decrements in weight, percent body fat, and body mass index. These findings parallel those reported in a recent Cochrane review, which found that promoting physical activity (including walking) increased fitness.3 However, another Cochrane review reported mixed findings for the effect of exercise on weight loss.4 Quantification of the effect of walking on cardiovascular risk factors is important because previous trials lacked assessment of health gains.
Interventions to encourage walking have been shown to increase the amount of walking by up to 30–60 min/wk on average.5 Taken in context with the review by Murphy et al, the combined findings suggest that efforts need to be targeted toward increasing walking in everyday life, with a challenge to develop environments that promote walking and reduce reliance on motor vehicles. Nurses in clinical practice need to encourage walking as a form of exercise, particularly among more sedentary populations (eg, women >14 y of age) and those at risk of cardiovascular disease.
Footnotes
Source of funding: no external funding.