rss
Evid Based Nurs 10:43 doi:10.1136/ebn.10.2.43
  • Treatment

Vaccinating infants with a wide long needle achieved comparable immune response and reduced local reactions compared with a narrow short needle


 
 Q Is vaccination of infants with a wide long needle equivalent or superior to a narrow short needle for immune response and local reactions?

METHODS

GraphicDesign:

randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

GraphicAllocation:

concealed.

GraphicBlinding:

blinded (data entry clerks and laboratory staff).

GraphicFollow up period:

3 to 4.5 months.

GraphicSetting:

18 general practices in 2 primary care trusts in the UK.

GraphicParticipants:

696 healthy infants due to receive their first immunisation (mean age 62 d, mean weight 5300 g, 52% boys). Exclusion criteria were <37 weeks gestation, birth weight <2500 g, or treatments or conditions that could bias evaluation of immune response.

GraphicIntervention:

vaccination with a 23 gauge, 25 mm needle (wide long needle, n = 240), a 25 gauge, 16 mm needle (narrow short needle, n = 230), or a 25 gauge, 25 mm needle (narrow long needle, n = 226). At 2, 3, and 4 months of age, infants received a combined diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, and Haemophilus influenzae type b …

No Related Web Pages

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of EBN.
View free sample issue >>

EBN Journal Chat

The EBN Journal Chat offers readers the opportunity to participate in discussion about research articles and commentaries from Evidence Based Nursing (EBN).

How to participate >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article