TREATMENT
Home-based cardiac rehab was as effective as hospital-based rehab in improving cardiac risk factors
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Is home-based cardiac rehabilitation as effective as hospital-based rehabilitation in low-to-moderate–risk patients with recent myocardial infarction or revascularisation procedure?
Design: randomised controlled trial. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 72884263.
Allocation: concealed.
Blinding: blinded (outcome assessors).
Follow-up period: 1 year.
Setting: 4 hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation centres in West Midlands, UK.
Patients: 525 patients (mean age 61 y, 77% men) who were referred to the rehabilitation programme within 12 weeks after myocardial infarction (49% of patients), percutaneous coronary angioplasty (40%), or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (11%). High-risk patients were excluded.
Intervention:
home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme (a manual and
3 home visits and
1 telephone call from a specially trained rehabilitation nurse over 12 wks) (n = 263) or hospital-based programme (attended 1–2 sessions/wk for 8–12 wks) (n = 262). Both programmes included exercise, relaxation, education, and lifestyle counselling.
Outcomes:
blood pressure, cholesterol concentrations, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score, distance walked (incremental
University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
