TREATMENT
Review: tight glucose control increases risk of hypoglycaemia but not short-term mortality in critically ill adults
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
R Wiener
Dr R Wiener, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA; renda.s.wiener@dartmouth.edu
What are the benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults?
Included studies compared tight glucose control (glucose goal <150 mg/dl [8.3 mmol/l] using an insulin infusion) with usual care in patients in adult intensive care units (ICUs) and had one of the outcomes of interest as a primary or secondary end point. Studies of primarily intraoperative interventions or that could not provide adequate outcome or methodological data were excluded. Outcomes of interest were hospital or 30-day mortality, septicaemia (sepsis, septicaemia, bacteraemia, or positive blood cultures), need for dialysis in patients without a pre-existing need, and hypoglycaemia (
1 blood glucose measurement
40 mg/dl [2.2 mmol/l]).
Medline (1950 to Jun 2008), Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2008), trial registries (Aug 2007), conference abstracts of American Thoracic Society (2001–8) and Society of
National Centre for Clinical Outcomes Research, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
