EBN NOTEBOOK
To lower or not to lower? Making sense of the latest research on intensive glycaemic control and cardiovascular outcomes
| The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below. |
In table 2 of this EBN notebook,1 one of the table footnotes was missing. The corrected footnotes are below:
*ITT intention-to-treat analysis. All comparisons are for intervention v standard therapy.
Outcomes for all patients who were followed up in the intervention phase and in the post-trial monitoring phase.
Statistically significant difference between intervention and standard therapy.
Mean HbA1c after 5 years of passive follow-up. At the end of the randomised intervention, median HbA1c concentrations were 7.0% v 7.9% for sulfonylurea/insulin v standard therapy and 7.4% v 8.0% for metformin v standard therapy.
- Sherifali D. To lower or not to lower? Making sense of the latest research on intensive glycaemic control and cardiovascular outcomes. Evid Based Nurs 2009;12:4–6.
[Free Full Text]
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
Topic Collections
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
