TREATMENT
Normal food at will and nil-by-mouth enteral feeding after major upper GI surgery did not differ for mortality or morbidity
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
K Lassen
Dr K Lassen, University Hospital Northern Norway, Tromso, Norway; lassen@unn.no
Does allowing normal food at will increase morbidity compared with "nil-by-mouth" enteral tube feeding (ETF) after major upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery?
Design: randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Allocation: concealed.
Blinding: {unblinded}.*
Follow-up period: 8 weeks.
Setting: 5 referral centres in Norway.
Patients: 453 patients (mean age 64 y, 59% men, based on 447 patients) who had major upper GI surgery. Exclusion criteria included severe extra-abdominal disease or trauma, life expectancy <3 months, or indications for parenteral nutrition.
Interventions: normal food at will (n = 220) or ETF by needle-catheter jejunostomy (n = 227) after surgery. ETF consisted of nutrition, 20 ml/h on day 1, increasing by 20 ml/h/d (if tolerated) up to 80 ml/h; after 5 days, patients were allowed food at will.
Outcomes:
mortality, major complications (including bacteraemia, sepsis, pneumonia, wound rupture, and pancreatitis). Secondary outcomes included minor
New York University College of Nursing, New York, New York, USA
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
