ASSESSMENT (SCREENING OR DIAGNOSIS)
Review: simple questions and clinical tests are moderately useful for diagnosing urinary incontinence
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
J M Holroyd-Leduc
Dr J M Holroyd-Leduc, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; jayna.holroyd-leduc@calgaryhealthregion.ca
How accurate are simple clinical procedures and tests for diagnosing urinary incontinence (UI) in adults?
Studies selected evaluated clinical diagnosis of stress or urge UI in adults and used a reference standard of diagnosis by an expert (urologist or urogynaecologist) and/or urodynamic studies in all patients. Outcomes were summary positive (+LR) and negative (–LR) likelihood ratios.
Medline and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica (to Jul 2007), and reference lists were searched for cohort and case–control studies published in English. 40 studies (age range 16–98 y, >99% women) met the selection criteria.
Simple questions such as "Do you lose urine during sudden physical exertion, lifting, coughing, or sneezing?" and "Do you experience such a strong and sudden urge to void that you leak before reaching the toilet?" identified stress and urge UI, respectively (table). 13 studies of 12 different incontinence
Trillium Health Centre, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
