TREATMENT
Review: some interventions may reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections and colonisation in the ICU
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
N Graves
Dr N Graves, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; n.graves@qut.edu.au
How do various interventions compare for reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) and colonisation in the intensive care unit (ICU)?
Studies selected evaluated short-term (<21 d) non-tunnelled catheters and reported incidence of CRBSI in patients
18 years of age in the ICU. Exclusion criteria included studies evaluating totally implantable or peripherally inserted central venous catheters or haemodialysis catheters, arterial venous catheters, and those conducted in diverse settings. Outcomes were CRBSI and colonisation.
Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Current Contents, Cochrane Library, Health Services Technology, Centre for Disease Control guideline and reports, and 8 other databases were searched (from 1985 to Feb 2007) for observational studies or randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English. 14 RCTs (n = 2235, mean age 59 y based on 10 RCTs), 1 non-RCT, and 8 observational studies met the selection criteria. 7 RCTs
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
