DIAGNOSIS
Chlamydia Rapid Test was moderately accurate for diagnosing Chlamydia infection in women
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
H H Lee
Dr H H Lee, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; hl207@cam.ac.uk
Is Chlamydia Rapid Test accurate for screening for and diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women?
Design: blinded comparison of Chlamydia Rapid Test with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing.
Setting: young peoples sexual health centre (site 1) and 2 genitourinary medicine clinics (sites 2 and 3) in the UK.
Participants:
1349 women
16 years of age who had not taken antibiotics in the previous month, were not currently menstruating, and provided valid samples (93% of eligible participants). Most women at site 1 (n = 663, mean age 19 y) were asymptomatic; about 67% of women at the genitourinary medicine clinics (n = 385, mean age 25 y at site 2; n = 301, mean age 28 y at site 3) were symptomatic (vaginal discharge or lower abdominal pain).
Description of tests:
Chlamydia Rapid Test (an immunoassay-based test that
MU Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
