TREATMENT
Review: prone positioning improved oxygenation on ventilation more than supine positioning in ARDS
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
C M Martin
Dr C M Martin, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; cmartin1@uwo.ca
In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on mechanical ventilation, does prone positioning result in better outcomes than supine positioning?
Studies selected compared prone positioning (
6 h/d) with supine positioning in adults who had ARDS and were mechanically ventilated. Outcomes were mortality, improvement in oxygenation, days on mechanical ventilation, and ventilator-associated pneumonia.
PubMed, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (to Nov 2006); and reference lists were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Experts were consulted. 5 RCTs (n = 1316) met the selection criteria. All trials had adequate concealment of allocation and minimal or no loss to follow-up.
Groups did not differ for mortality, although subgroup analysis showed a mortality benefit with prone positioning in more seriously ill patients (table). Oxygenation improved more with prone
Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
