TREATMENT
Spontaneous awakening trials plus spontaneous breathing trials improved weaning from mechanical ventilation
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
T D Girard
Dr T D Girard, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; timothy.girard@vanderbilt.edu
In sedated patients on mechanical ventilation, are daily spontaneous awakening trials (SATs) combined with spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) more effective for ventilator weaning than daily SBTs with sedation per usual care?
Design: randomised controlled trial.
Allocation: concealed.
Blinding: unblinded.
Follow-up period: 1 year.
Setting: 4 medical intensive care units (ICUs) in the USA.
Patients:
336 patients
18 years of age (median age 61 y, 52% men) who required mechanical ventilation for
12 hours and were receiving patient-targeted sedation. Exclusion criteria included admission after cardiac arrest, continuous ventilation for
2 weeks, and profound neurological deficits.
Intervention:
daily SAT followed by SBT (n = 168) or daily SBT with sedation per usual care (n = 168). In the SAT + SBT group, patients who passed an SAT safety screen had an SAT. Patients who failed the
McGill University School of Nursing, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
